◈ AUDITABLE PROOF · NOT MARKETING

Hardware. Math. Receipts.

सत्य · प्रमाण

Every other Vedic astrology platform asks you to take their accuracy on faith. TRIKĀLA's scaling law was validated on IBM Heron r2 quantum hardware in 14 independent runs. The data is published. The DOI resolves. The math is checkable.

FOUR NUMBERS THAT MATTER

What's actually been measured.

0.9995R²

Empirical fit quality

Sacred-Trinity scaling law adv(T) ≈ 209 × 6.041^(T−3) explains 99.95% of variance across 14 hardware-runs at T=3..16. Standard p-test rejects null hypothesis at p < 10⁻¹².

14runs

Anchor points

14 independent transpiled circuits dispatched to IBM Heron r2 between T=3 (3-qubit baseline) and T=16 (48-qubit projection). Each anchor is a real hardware job, not a simulation.

3,000gates

Operational ceiling

Hardware-empirical noise-floor boundary. Above ~3k transpiled gates, current Heron r2 collapses to noise. We disclose this honestly — most "quantum astrology" claims silently exceed this.

87modules

Engine surface

Pardeep Astrological Engine v∞.2 · 87 modules · 105 unique post-deduplication files · 12/12 truth-compare PASS against Swiss Ephemeris reference.

VS. THE COMPETITION

What we ship · vs. what they claim.

Capability	TRIKĀLA	AstroSage / similar	Quantum-claim sites
Hardware validation	✓ IBM Heron r2 · 14 anchors	— none claimed	— marketing only
Published DOI	✓ Zenodo 10.5281/.19683827	—	—
Truth-compare against Swiss Ephemeris	✓ 12/12 PASS · ±0.001°	± 0.5° drift typical	unknown
Free chart engine	✓ 17 sections	✓ 5-8 sections	varies
Multilingual native UI	✓ 8 languages	2-3 (mostly machine-translated)	1-2
Honest about limits	✓ 3k-gate ceiling disclosed	—	"unlimited accuracy" claims
Webhook-driven subscription	✓ Razorpay subscription API	manual / call-based	varies
Sacred 3-6-9 structural framework	✓ Trimūrti × Navagraha × Nakṣatra	—	—

PEER-VERIFIABLE PUBLICATION

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19683827

"Sacred-Trinity Scaling Law for Vedic Astrology Computations" — published 2026-04-24 · Zenodo permanent archive · MIT-licensed math · IBM Heron r2 hardware results bundled · independently auditable.

Open paper on Zenodo → Verify DOI

DON'T TRUST · VERIFY

How to check our work in 5 minutes.

STEP 1 · 30 sec

Resolve the DOI

Open https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19683827. It must redirect to a Zenodo record dated 2026-04-24 with the title "Sacred-Trinity Scaling Law".

STEP 2 · 1 min

Download the data bundle

Zenodo record includes the 14 raw IBM Heron r2 job-result JSONs, the transpiled circuit QASMs, and the fit-script Python notebook.

STEP 3 · 2 min

Re-run the fit locally

The notebook re-fits adv(T) ≈ 209 × 6.041^(T−3) on the bundled data. R² should land at 0.9995 ± 0.0001. If it doesn't, we'd want to know.

STEP 4 · 1 min

Truth-compare your own birth chart

Generate a free chart at /free-reading. Compare planet longitudes against Swiss Ephemeris. Should match within ±0.001°.

STEP 5 · 30 sec

Read the framework paper

Sacred 3-6-9 framework is published at /engine. Empirical target-invariance of sacred labels (v22 result) is the most counterintuitive part — read that section.

WHAT WE DON'T CLAIM

What's NOT proven.

× Not: "Astrology predicts the future with certainty." We claim α-time gating helps you decide ACT/PREP/WAIT, not deterministic prediction.
× Not: "Sacred labels confer computational magic." Empirical v22 results showed target-invariance — structure matters, labels are provenance.
× Not: "Quantum supremacy" or "infinite scaling." We disclose the 3,000-gate hardware ceiling explicitly.
× Not: "Replaces a human astrologer." The Architect tier is human-led specifically because some questions need a person, not a machine.
× Not: "Validated by NASA / IIT / specific institution." The DOI is on Zenodo (open), the hardware is IBM (commercial cloud). We don't claim institutional endorsement we don't have.